1  2  3  4  5  Next >

"Ellen White's Contradictions on Jewelry"

This accusation came to us from the web sites of both Dirk Anderson and Robert Sanders.

Charge

According to what Dirk has told us, this is his very best example of Ellen White contradicting herself, and consequently, one of his very best evidences that Ellen White was not a divinely-inspired messenger. Essentially, Dirk feels he has found a concrete example of where Ellen White didn't practice what she preached.

Ellen White, like John Wesley, Charles Spurgeon, and Charles Finney, believed that Peter and Paul in the New Testament encouraged Christians not to wear ornamental jewelry. Why? What's the big deal? Well, they felt that it was wrong to spend lots of money to decorate ourselves merely to gratify pride and attract attention. We'll take a look at what each of these writers actually said in our Further Analysis section.

We now quote this allegation, written by both Dirk Anderson and Sydney Cleveland, from Dirk's web site.

Initial Observations

Dirk and Cleveland stated emphatically above, "a decorative brooch and a gold chain." From the picture they give to prove their point (see below), we can't tell whether the "chain" is gold or not, and it isn't because we're color blind. It's because whoever took this picture around 1878 forgot to put color film in their camera. We thus can't tell if the "chain" is made out of gold, brass, leather, or hemp, or whether it's a chain at all.

Neither can we verify that the brooch in the picture was decorative. The detail of the various versions of the photograph that we have examined just isn't good enough to know for sure.

Looks like this one may be hard to prove.

Analysis

Something is odd about this picture. Dirk and Cleveland claim that it came from Cleveland's book, but see what you think:

From Dirk's Site From Cleveland's Book

Since the picture as given on Dirk's site includes Elizabeth holding a book, a part of the photograph omitted in Cleveland's book, we know for certain that that picture didn't come from Cleveland's book. This is but a minor discrepancy, though since Dirk's site specializes in accusing others of plagiarism, it would be best if he acknowledged every source.

More major is the fact that the picture from Dirk's site appears to have been tampered with:

1. While the background is grainy (a residue of the printing process), the faces and dresses are smooth. This is because they have been selectively blurred using photo-editing software.
2. In Dirk's picture the "gold chain" is much, much lighter than Ellen White's dress, while in the picture from Cleveland's book it is the same shade of grey as most of her dress. This indicates that the color of these parts of the picture has been tinkered with as well.

Compare Dirk's picture with the original from the White Estate. Notice how much detail in the dresses was lost:

From Dirk's Site From the White Estate

Now here's a close up of Dirk's picture so that you can see better what we mean. While you're looking, note carefully how the "chain" ends at Ellen White's side:

Dirk's Picture Magnified 2x

Anyone who has edited scans of printed pictures will easily recognize that this was once a halftone in a book or periodical. It was then scanned into a computer, and after scanning was doctored up. At least part of the tampering took place after the picture was scanned.

For those who are unfamiliar with such techniques, we've taken an excerpt out of Dirk's picture and have blurred it. Notice how the graininess left over from the printing process has disappeared, making the entire picture as smooth as the dresses and face are.

Untouched Excerpt 2x Blurred Excerpt 2x

Now we want to concentrate on that "chain" as seen in both Dirk's picture and the original from the White Estate. We want to see where the "chain" begins and ends in each picture, and we want to compare its color with Ellen White's dress. We'll use excerpts again:

From Dirk's Site 2x From Original 2x

Whoever tampered with this picture made the "chain" lighter than the wall, when in the original it is much darker than the wall. They also took the liberty to draw the chain to the side of the dress, when in the original it ends at the front of the dress.

Honestly, it appears to us that Ellen White was wearing a pocket watch. We therefore had this picture analyzed by a Mennonite who is an authority on antique watches, and he confirmed our suspicions. He told us there was no doubt that Ellen White was wearing a slide chain for the pocket watch that she had in a pocket on the front of her dress.

Unfortunately, whoever tampered with this picture wasn't as knowledgeable as our Mennonite friend. Hence they drew the "chain" so that it extended over to the side of her dress.

Apparently the original photograph wasn't convincing enough, and someone, perhaps Dirk, decided to alter it, even drawing the chain to where it didn't belong. Why is that such a big deal? Because Dirk's web page on this topic goes on to accuse the White Estate of tampering with photographs:

Thus, the very best example that one of Ellen White's most avid critics has of her contradicting herself appears to be one of the very best examples of the critics contradicting themselves.

This is so utterly bizarre. How can any critic of Ellen White expect anyone to believe them when they tamper with the evidence, and then immediately accuse others of doing the very type of tampering that they just did?

(Update: Dirk helps us narrow down who tampered with the picture.)

Give Us Your Opinion #1

We have a bit more to look at, of course. What was Ella wearing? What about brooches? What did Spurgeon, Finney, and Wesley have to say? But before we continue, we'd like to give you an opportunity to comment on the above discovery:

1  2  3  4  5  Next >

Site published by
AdventWeb

AdventWeb